<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puzzle #104: &#8220;Early Deployment&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beekeeperlabs.com/xwdblog/2009/07/08/puzzle-104-early-deployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beekeeperlabs.com/xwdblog/2009/07/08/puzzle-104-early-deployment/</link>
	<description>Themed Puzzles from Beekeeper Labs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 01:15:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: keeper</title>
		<link>http://beekeeperlabs.com/xwdblog/2009/07/08/puzzle-104-early-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-4832</link>
		<dc:creator>keeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beekeeperlabs.com/xwdblog/?p=196#comment-4832</guid>
		<description>Leslieann --

We are pleased that you have enjoyed our puzzles enough to work through all of them, flaws and all.  We make an effort to make the puzzle correct and enjoyable, but we are not perfect.  We also do not have the resources of the New York Times to hire professional editors.  Each puzzle certainly *is* scanned multiple times, but this doesn&#039;t prevent mistakes from slipping in.

As for your suggestions on formatting for the printable versions:  they have been heard and noted, and will be considered.  However, we reserve the right to choose how we present our own material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leslieann &#8211;</p>
<p>We are pleased that you have enjoyed our puzzles enough to work through all of them, flaws and all.  We make an effort to make the puzzle correct and enjoyable, but we are not perfect.  We also do not have the resources of the New York Times to hire professional editors.  Each puzzle certainly *is* scanned multiple times, but this doesn&#8217;t prevent mistakes from slipping in.</p>
<p>As for your suggestions on formatting for the printable versions:  they have been heard and noted, and will be considered.  However, we reserve the right to choose how we present our own material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslieann</title>
		<link>http://beekeeperlabs.com/xwdblog/2009/07/08/puzzle-104-early-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-4830</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslieann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beekeeperlabs.com/xwdblog/?p=196#comment-4830</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t find them all that hard. But I must say it would help if you did not make typos or misspell words in your clues. For instance, &quot;rabii&quot; instead of &quot;rabbi&quot; in #61 from last Sept. All you need to do is read them over once and make sure you don&#039;t have these errors. They are confusing. I&#039;ve said this before. I&#039;ve also said the printout of the puzzle should have the puzzle number and date on it. Both of these complaints have been ignored so far. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t find them all that hard. But I must say it would help if you did not make typos or misspell words in your clues. For instance, &#8220;rabii&#8221; instead of &#8220;rabbi&#8221; in #61 from last Sept. All you need to do is read them over once and make sure you don&#8217;t have these errors. They are confusing. I&#8217;ve said this before. I&#8217;ve also said the printout of the puzzle should have the puzzle number and date on it. Both of these complaints have been ignored so far. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

